Latest News:
February 18, 2019: Website updated and revised.

Film Review: “Capone”

CaponeI don’t see the point of this film other than as a cautionary tale on the miseries of syphilis, a message put across more effectively by those public safety shorts  made back in the 30’s and into the 60’s.

A reflection on the last year of America’s most notorious hoodlum, this film generated zero dramatic tension for me. Capone is shown at his Florida mansion as he becomes increasingly more deranged and dysfunctional as the spirochetes eat away his mind while friends and family watch on in helpless despair.

The film made considerable efforts to develop an effective mise-en-scene with  antique cars, authentic  costumes (men in period suits, women in print dresses), and Florida location shots. The effect was somewhat spoiled though by two glaring anachronisms, which probably won’t bother anyone else at all: 1. Nessun Dorma plays regularly in the background, only sung by Pavarotti who at the time the film was set was still in knee pants; and 2. Capone hallucinates back to a party in his honor at the roaring ’20’s height, only racially integrated with black and Asian guests, something that just didn’t happen in that highly prejudiced era, especially among lowlife gangsters.

Throughout the film, Capone battles various enemies, real and imagined. Under constant government surveillance, figures from Capone’s past emerge as well, with much interplay between what’s supposed to be actually happening and the ghosts in Capone’s mind. What passes for a plot turns on the $10 million Capone may have stashed somewhere. Even this McGuffin didn’t stir any interest as far as I was concerned. Although a film about a gangster, Capone largely lacks the elements of a crime film that fans of the genre enjoy. Since it’s a film solely about a man’s degenerative end, no stakes seem to be involved; there’s no real story arc about the rise and fall of a vicious gangster as in Scarface (both the original and the Pacino remake). We’re just asked instead to contemplate the pitiful, sordid physical and mental decay of a truly rotten human being.

This is despite a strong cast of talented actors (e.g., Matt Dillon, Kyle McLachlan) with an over the top performance by the lead. Tom Hardy proves once again he will literally do anything the role requires. Face covered in putty to depict deep scars and syphilitic sores, he staggers around the house and grounds growling in a deep baritone, throwing fits, fouling the bed while asleep with his wife, and ultimately reduced to wearing adult diapers with carrots substituted for the cigars Capone chain smoked.

The problem is that, despite the makeup and method acting, Hardy really doesn’t resemble Capone who had a very round, moon face. This has happened before. One particularly egregious example was casting the very Irish looking Jason Robards as Capone in The St. Valentine’s Day Massacre. Capone left me with such a bad taste I immediately watched Al Capone afterward, the well done, realistic ’59 flick in which Rod Steiger (who facially did resemble Capone) masterfully portrayed the criminal in all his boorish flamboyance.

I recommend this film to no one.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6199572/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

https://www.amazon.com/Capone-Tom-Hardy/dp/B088BLDZHV/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=capone&qid=1589663152&sr=8-1

Film Review: “The Homesman”

homesmanAlthough a beautiful, finely made film, this is also the saddest Western I’ve ever seen, tragic to the point of heartbreak. This makes sense since it takes an unflinching look at the real frontier experience and is definitely not some Hollywood fantasy. Three women in mid-19th Century Nebraska go mad from the strain of living on the raw, empty prairie. Unable to care for them, local folk decide to send them back East, a migration in reverse.

Hilary Swank gives an outstanding performance as Mary Bee Cuddy, the finest, truest example of a brave, good frontier woman in film I’ve ever seen, better even than Jean Arthur in Shane. I deeply admired her character as the movie went on and empathized with her struggles and disappointments, many at the hands of thoughtless, callous men. Her tragic, unexpected end simply made me want to weep.

On the other hand, George Briggs, the protagonist played by Tommy Lee Jones (who also directed), is the sorriest excuse for a Western hero who ever forked a horse. A larcenous, lying, shiftless drifter who thinks exclusively of himself, rescued from hanging by Cuddy’s unexpected arrival, Briggs’s sluggish development of the rudiments of a conscience as he travels with Cuddy and the madwomen back to Iowa constitutes the story’s moral arc. Despite occasional kindness and displays of frontier savvy and toughness, Briggs is never fully sympathetic, with instances throughout the film of his general bad character and others’ contempt and disregard for him. Jones gives his usual professional performance, completely committed to the role, unpleasant as it is.

Jones also did an outstanding job directing. Long shots of the bare, unforgiving Nebraskan plains with miserable sod huts cut into low hills to escape the punishing wind, effective backstories showing how each poor, suffering woman went mad, accurate mise-en-scene with authentic period detail throughout, and strong performances all around by well cast actors. Three particular standouts are John Lithgow as a good hearted, frontier minister; Tim Blake Nelson in a brief, but effective turn in one of his signature rustic roles, and Meryl Streep as the minister’s wife who takes the madwomen into her home in Iowa.

The film’s last scene is especially effective: the incorrigible reprobate Briggs dances and sings aboard a ferry headed back West, accompanied by a banjo and bones, with strong intimations of his own imminent death. Jones shows grace and style in this scene and I’m certain he meant to evoke the famous 19th Century painting of a young man dancing aboard a flatboat. Yet rather than evoke images of hope, progress, and growth, the conclusion only hints at more miserable violence.

This is a good Western, but not for folks who prefer stuff like Gene Autry or John Wayne flicks.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2398231/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

https://www.amazon.com/Homesman-Tommy-Lee-Jones/dp/B00PM6G5TW/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=the+homesman&qid=1589077847&sr=8-1

Film Review: “The Keeping Room”

keepingThis film basically takes the incident from Gone With The Wind where Scarlett shoots a Union soldier and Melly helps her hide the body and fleshes it out into a full length film described as a revisionist Western, but it strikes me as more accurately characterized as a horror movie with a naturalistic, Civil War setting.

Two sisters, Augusta and Louise, and a female slave, Mad, struggle to survive at subsistence level on their Georgia farm during the menfolk’s absence, any forest game long ago hunted out, living off potato and carrot stew.

A full plate of misery turns into a veritable brimming cornucopia of woe and pain in the form of two bummers from Sherman’s army, sent ahead to reconnoiter supplies for advancing Union columns, but instead using the opportunity to engage in plunder, arson, and murder. The film’s opening scene introducing them is a tightly constructed, Grand Guignol pageant of horrid savagery that effectively frames both characters and the arc their nihilistic souls will follow. A sight of the attractive Augusta at a local tavern, on a desperate quest to find medicine for her raccoon bit sister, is enough to set the bummers after her. They arrive at night and a frantic siege of the farmhouse ensues, marked by rapidly escalating tension, violence, and rape. This part of the film reminded me of Straw Dogs where Dustin Hoffman fought off intruders, also while  besieged in a remote farmhouse.

Strong performances are given by everyone in the film, but particular credit goes to Brit Marling as Augusta, Sam Worthington as the head thug Moses, and especially Muna Otaru as Mad the family slave. Marling is convincing as an innately strong, beautiful young Southern woman, determined to preserve herself and her own no matter what, a true, brave lady as shown by her constant, selfless devotion and physical courage. Worthington is an interesting study of a villainous monster with sympathetic human flashes, confessing at one point he doesn’t know how to stop what he’s doing. The acting palm definitely goes to Otaru though with her portrayal of a young woman who’s experienced the absolute worst slavery has to offer, but still remains indomitable, dead game, ready to fight to the bitter end.

Although not didactic, this film faces some hard truths about American history, how the Civil War in general and Sherman’s March in particular were perfect settings for men to indulge in the very worst of human nature, becoming outright murderous psychopaths, the pure, steadily gnawing terror of women alone and near defenseless on an isolated farmstead, and the sheer, disgusting misery of slavery.  Yet even with all that heavy import, it’s still one hell of a horror movie with fast pacing, grotesque, disturbing imagery, and gritty, realistic violence.

This film isn’t for the squeamish. It also doesn’t seem to fit the Western genre. I recommend it to horror fans and Civil War buffs.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2488778/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

https://www.amazon.com/Keeping-Room-Brit-Marling/dp/B07CNK75XL/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=the+keeping+room&qid=1588906434&sr=8-1

Film Review: “The Tracker”

TrackerThis is a hardboiled, downright brutal at times, Australian “Western” along the lines of The Proposition, but with a more stripped down plot and a deeper focus on the nation-continent’s racism, specifically white persecution of aboriginals.

Set in 1922, the film puts you in the middle of things from the start: three white policeman in the bush, sent to catch a fugitive aboriginal accused of murdering a white woman, led by an aboriginal tracker. Rather than names, the  mythical aspect is stressed through calling the characters by terms that describe their personalities, the Fanatic, the senior policeman, the Follower, a raw, new recruit, and the Veteran, a saddened, weary, older man.

As you can probably guess from his name, the Fanatic is just that, a miserable, sadistic racist who delights in the abuse and murder of aboriginals. Despite continual setbacks, largely his own fault, he drives the search party on to catch their quarry, always demanding absolute obedience and control. Most of his abuse is reserved for the Tracker, the smiling, deferential aboriginal guide who patiently plods ahead on  foot while the whites ride on horseback, as his keen, bush savvy eyes unerringly pick out the escaping Fugitive’s path.

Despite his complete underdog status, regarded as less than human by the whites, especially the vicious Fanatic, the Tracker quickly proves to have carefully hidden reserves of cunning, resourcefulness, and knowledge the whites consider him simply incapable of possessing. He’s brilliantly underplayed by the aboriginal actor David Gulpilil, who was also in The Proposition. One way or another, he continually gets the better of the Fanatic as he leads the whites further into the bush. Gary Sweet also gives a good performance as the Fanatic, practically foaming at the mouth in his murderous frenzy to abuse aboriginals, men, women, and children alike, made all the more terrifying by his staring, intense, pale blue eyes.

There are frequent scenes of brutality against aboriginals with the worst depicted through shots of Mother Hubbard style primitive paintings. It’s still tough to watch and made even more horrible by knowing such behavior was not only condoned, but frequently honored. The Follower, played by Damon Gameau, has an interesting story arc as he steadily grows more repulsed by the Fanatic’s indiscriminate slaughter. Like any good Western, landscape is one of the most important characters.  The Tracker is deeply satisfying from that aspect as well with frequent, long, lyrical tracking shots of Australia’s bush, from rocky, lifeless plains to endless, rugged mountain vistas covered with scrub, as awe inspiring in its worn, weathered way as the American West. Most interesting of all are the aboriginal characters, especially those at the end who remain true to the ancient traditions, ominously rattling long spears at a white intruder.

I recommend this film to anyone who likes a good Western or those interested in Australian history, warts and all. Viewer be warned, however. Like The Proposition, you’ll need a pretty strong stomach to watch this one.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212132/?ref_=fn_al_tt_2

https://www.amazon.com/Tracker-David-Gulpilil/dp/B01M25W77R/ref=sr_1_8?dchild=1&keywords=the+tracker&qid=1588299449&sr=8-8

Film Review: “Django, Kill… If You Live, Shoot!”

Django

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The late, great George “Gabby” Hayes, King of the Old Hollywood western sidekicks, once gave his opinion of the genre.   “I hate ’em,” Hayes honestly answered. “Really can’t stand ’em. They always are the same. You have so few plots.”

Hayes obviously never saw Django Kill…If You Live, Shoot!, a bizarre blend of spaghetti western with grotesquerie from a giallo horror film. Thomas Milian, a Cuban-American actor who did OK in Italy playing psycho gunslingers, is the Stranger, half Mexican, half American, gunned down with the other Mexicans in a gang by their treacherous American compadres after a gold theft. Buried alive, Milian crawls out from a mass grave and is found by two Native American scavengers who don’t resemble actual Native Americans at all. After they revive Milian and fit him out with some golden bullets for his gun (“more deadly than lead”), he pursues his betrayers and comes to a town called The Unhappy Place. And here’s where it got really weird.

The Stranger learns the gang members were murdered before he arrived. This is one of the first very nasty scenes  where the gang is cruelly hunted down by a much bigger mob and either shot or hung with their bodies left hanging as a warning.  The rest of the film turns on various characters’ search for the stolen gold, the real villain of the film. The saloon keeper plots and fights with the general store owner while both men fear Sorrow, the openly gay, flamboyant big rancher with a pistolero army clad in black shirts with fancy white embroidery (too butch). Through it all the Stranger drifts, in the town, but not of it, a serene, Christ like figure except for his habit of pumping people full of golden bullets. The identification with Jesus gets literal when Sorrow’s bully boys kidnap the Stranger, strip him to a loincloth, and chain him to a cross.

Django has the standard spaghetti Western trimmings, guys who obviously aren’t American wearing cowboy hats with ridiculously dinky brims; location shots in Spain that don’t resemble the American Southwest at all; absurdly grandiose, highfalutin dialogue; not much in the way of continuity, only adding to the confusion; and most importantly, much time spent with characters engaged in long, silent portentous stares at one another. Add to that a steady stream of downright bizarre imagery and events, a small, prone child being ground down by a man in a chair; a madwoman trapped in a second floor room who cryptically signals from the window; a defiled cemetery with the crosses flung down and the graves dug open, all to find the gold, and it adds up to a trip, albeit an unpleasant one. The penultimate scene where a character’s greed ends in a literal shower of molten gold simply must be seen to be believed.

I recommend this film to fans of spaghetti Westerns, giallo horror movies, and anybody with a strong stomach who digs a crazy flick. If you’re not overly concerned about petty stuff like good taste and a plausible plot, you’re in for one wild, weird ride.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062082/plotsummary?ref_=tt_stry_pl#synopsis

https://www.amazon.com/Django-Kill-You-Live-Shoot/dp/B07D96H6TW/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=Django+kill&qid=1587180311&sr=8-1

Book Review: “The Rise And Fall Of Charles Lindbergh”

LindberghI’ve come across some bizarre characters in biographies, particularly American bios for some reason. We may not be exceptional in other ways, but we sure lead the pack in producing notable head cases. Two salient examples are Howard Hughes and L. Ron Hubbard.

Yet of all the oddballs I’ve encountered, Charles Lindbergh is one of the strangest cats I’ve ever read about. Possibly the best pilot this country ever produced, undoubtedly brave with a brilliant, scientific mind, Lindbergh was a bundle of strange impulses and drives whose repellent qualities, most particularly his obsessive racism and anti-Semitism, made it difficult to sympathize with him, even considering his child’s kidnapping, one of the most notorious incidents of the 1930’s.

Of Swedish descent (this surprised me given his German name and notorious Teutonophilia), Lindbergh was from a second marriage with a large age gap between the parents and Lindbergh their only child. His wealthy father served as a Congressman. Lindbergh basically grew up with his mother, a controlling, distant woman who largely home schooled him. Due to this and being constantly on the move, Lindbergh spent no time with other children, a significant factor in his remote character and serious empathy deficiency. If Lindbergh wasn’t born with Asberger’s syndrome, his mom provided the right environment to make him that way with results good and bad. Lindbergh’s powers of will and concentration were superhuman, with outstanding results as a pilot. On the other hand, Lindbergh was aloof all his life. He also had engineer’s disease: he was always right about absolutely everything.

The bio moves briskly through Lindbergh’s early days as a pilot, the stupendous Atlantic crossing, a feat of courage, endurance, and will never to be matched again, the ensuing fame and adulation that was a curse for the painfully shy Lindbergh, his marriage to writer Anne Morrow that he designed as carefully as a blueprint for a new plane, her life together with this incredibly controlling man, and the awful kidnapping. The author efficiently summarizes the evidence, making it plain Hauptmann was guilty. Despite this awful tragedy, Lindbergh is less than sympathetic even here. Rather than let the police investigate, he took over, wasting time and money listening to obvious con men.

Charles and Anne moved on, having more kids along the way. Always in demand as a leading aviation expert and a huge celebrity, Lindbergh was sought after, nowhere more so than in Nazi Germany where Luftwaffe chief Hermann Goering invited Lindbergh to see the newly revived air industry. Lindbergh accepted and happily swallowed the Nazi doctrine.

This is the worst aspect of Lindbergh’s personality (and he had a lot). He was a hardcore white supremacist, convinced civilization was about to be destroyed by black, brown, and yellow hordes, all insidiously controlled by Jews. Lindbergh became involved in the isolationist America First movement, openly siding with Hitler in the war’s early years before American entry into the conflict. This led to his reputation being seriously tarnished, no longer considered the brave, handsome, young man who embodied American values.

Lindbergh moved past this to some extent, becoming involved in aircraft production during WWII, even finally figuring how to get to the Pacific front where he flew fifty combat missions as a civilian, well into middle age. In postwar years he traveled, working diligently as an environmentalist. He also found time to have children in Germany with three separate women while still married to Anne and micromanaging her life and their kids when he was home. It was bigamy and very big of him too. This alone illustrates what an odd, almost sociopathic personality Lindbergh had.

This is a good biography, fast paced and easy to read. Ms. Fleming’s bibliography shows her previous books were in the young adult and middle grade fields, which may explain her gift for straightforward explanation and a highly readable narrative.

I recommend this book to anyone interested in aviation, 20th Century American history, and those who like a good read about a weird dude.

https://www.amazon.com/Rise-Fall-Charles-Lindbergh-ebook/dp/B07SZQQB9K/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2W5N742YQB4X5&dchild=1&keywords=the+rise+and+fall+of+charles+lindbergh&qid=1586654617&sprefix=the+rise+and+fall+of+charles%2Caps%2C153&sr=8-1

 

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/50746168-the-rise-and-fall-of-charles-lindbergh?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=PfmaS4tS6S&rank=1

“Trick Roller” Out Soon In Coffin Bell Journal

Trick Roller

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trick Roller, my hardboiled crime/horror short story about a Las Vegas whore who drugs her johns and then robs them, has been accepted for publication by Coffin Bell Journal, a journal of dark literature that goes beyond traditional horror. The story will appear in Volume 3, Issue 3, in July.  I got the idea for this yarn from a true crime cable TV show that featured a purported trick roller.  She came across as credible, given what she said about how much she hated men. Big thanks to the editorial staff of Coffin Bell for the acceptance. As I’m sure just about all of you appreciate, any encouragement is welcome at this rather dark point in our lives.

coffin bell

https://coffinbell.com/

 

 

Film Review: “The Texan”

Cooper

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

According to the IMDB webpage for The Texan, although one of hundreds made by Paramount whose rights were sold for TV distribution in the industry’s early days, this film has apparently NEVER been broadcast until March 2020, a gap of nearly a century since it was last seen. It’s paradoxically a pity the film went so long unviewed and simultaneously delightful it’s been recently unearthed for modern film fans to see. And The Texan is absolutely worth watching, a fast moving, well scripted, pre-Code gem based on an O. Henry story.

Cooper plays the Llano Kid, a larcenous Texas outlaw, quick with his pistol, with a knack for evading the law. He falls in with Thacker, ably and gruffly played by Oscar Apfel, a con man with a proposal. Thacker knows a wealthy Mexican widow who pines for her son who ran away years ago. He asks the Kid to pose as the son so they can cheat the widow out of her money. Although initially reluctant, the Kid’s mercenary instincts prompt him to go along. In Mexico, the Kid meets the widow, Dona Ibarra (somewhat overplayed by Emma Dunn) and his gorgeous, friendly cousin, Counsuelo, a perfectly lovely Fay Wray, hard to recognize here as a brunette and doing a passably accurate Mexican accent.

Cooper’s Kid is a type he played to perfection in later years, a tough, capable cowboy, able to handle conflict, but tonguetied when emotion is involved, especially with women. As his character spends time with Dona Ibarra, you watch his reserve worn down by her overpowering, unconditional love. She loves him like a mother and the Kid comes to love Dona Ibarra as a son. This leads to a climactic scene where the Kid tersely but eloquently tells Thacker he wants no further part of his miserable scheme.  Cooper shows strong acting talent here. Cooper’s rejection of Thacker leads to a violent shootout at the film’s end. With no further spoilers, the film comes to a satisfying dramatic conclusion.

Cooper wasn’t even 30 when he made this film and he’s a delight to see. Smooth featured (this was decades before his face lift), impossibly long and lean, a true top cowhand just as much at ease in the saddle as on foot, endowed with natural style and poise, Cooper looks fantastic in a flat hat and short vest, particularly when he dresses as a vaquero in Mexico with high boots, a serape, and a long, braided quirt. His acting was good throughout the film with even a flash of his impish humor when Dona Ibarra serves the Llano Kid a typical American meal of doughnuts, pickles, and apple pie. Fay Wray was a very beautiful woman and did a good job with the limited part she had as the romantic interest. Strong support was provided by James A. Marcus as the Bible spouting, pistol toting Texas sheriff John Brown.

Anybody who’s a fan of Gary Cooper or Western movies (can there be any gap between those two sets?) needs to see this film right away!

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0021463/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

https://www.amazon.com/Texan-Gary-Cooper/dp/B0856VJK9H/ref=sr_1_4?dchild=1&keywords=the+texan&qid=1586142203&sr=8-4

 

Film Review: “Simon, King Of The Witches”

SimonThe early ’70’s were a weird time of flux in the movie  industry. The break up of the old studio system along with the replacement of the Hayes Code by the much more permissive rating system led to a lot of different, daring experiments in film, some rated as among the most interesting, challenging efforts to come from Hollywood.

It also led to an incredible amount of shlock with really no artistic value whatsoever, just pure exploitation and titillation with an increased emphasis on sex and violence to draw young viewers to drive-ins and grindhouse theaters.

This review pertains to the latter category. Simon is an excellent example of an early ’70’s grade Z trash flick, right down to the almost non existent production values, cruddy special effects, acting both wooden and hammy, ludicrous dialogue replete with lines plainly meant for laughs, and a fair amount of naked female flesh, all played up to seem as decadent and sinister as possible.

The zero budget is reflected from the beginning when the protagonist, Simon (Andrew Prine), walks out of a storm drain into pouring rain and casually announces to the camera that he’s a magician.  Prine (a cousin of now ailing folk/country singer John Prine) does a lot to carry the film forward with his matter of fact, downright blase at times portrayal, often affecting an Orson Welles manner with a cigar clenched in his teeth and jovial bonhomie. Inexplicably well groomed and dressed for a guy who lives in a sewer, Simon takes up company with a cheerful male prostitute, Turk (George Paulsin), who introduces him in turn to Hercules, a rich, flamboyant gay man with a wide circle of friends. Through his charm and magical prowess, Simon manipulates Turk, Hercules, and everyone in their circle, most especially hippy chick Linda (Brenda Scott) who also happens to be the district attorney’s daughter (Whoa!).

Things proceed in this silly, tacky, entertaining vein for over ninety minutes. Simon casts spells with his magic dagger with nothing but trouble and doom as the result for wealthy thrill seekers, hippy dopers, a ridiculously gay man out cruising, and most of all, poor, sweet Linda (although not a conventional beauty, Scott was an exceptionally pretty young woman). In addition to flaunting a lot of previously taboo subjects, Simon is an interesting period piece with a strange mix of outfits from straight hippy to early disco, all garish beyond belief, from the very beginning of the ’70’s, the era that good taste forgot. There’s a funny scene where Simon and Turk attend a witches’ coven with Warhol actress Ultra Violet as the den mother. The dialog is pretty snappy with Prine getting a fair share of the yuks. Example:  at one point in the film, Simon rents a basement apartment. In the grumpy landlord’s presence, he chalks a five pointed star on the stairwell. The landlord looks at the star and says: “Forgive me, rabbi! I didn’t mean to seem prejudiced. I hope you enjoy your stay.”

I recommend this film to ’70’s shlock aficionados. It should be right up their alley.

https://www.amazon.com/Simon-King-Witches-Allyson-Ames/dp/B0015I2S0G

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067757/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Beware Of A Laughing Roman!

Laugher162

He probably wants to steal everything you have and make you his slave.